Self-check · Relationships
Toxic Relationship Quiz: 15 questions on the patterns that predict harm
A toxic relationship is one whose normal state is contempt, imbalance or disrespect rather than occasional conflict — every couple argues, and that is not what this measures. These 15 private questions ask how often the patterns associated with relationships failing show up in yours.
-
PATTERNS, NOT ARGUMENTS15 questionsEvery couple argues. This asks what the normal state of things is.
-
TOXIC IS NOT UNSAFECoercive control is a different thingA relationship can be genuinely bad for you without being dangerous. Knowing which one you are in changes what help you need.
-
PRIVATENothing is saved or sentFree, no account, no sign-up. Your result stays in your browser.
A self-check
Take the toxic relationship quiz
Fifteen questions about criticism, contempt, conflict and control. About two minutes, and the result appears only in your browser.
Your result
What the ranges mean
- 0–15 Largely healthy — ordinary conflict, not toxic patterns
- 16–30 Some concerns — worth naming one specific thing
- 31–45 Significant concerns — likely affecting your wellbeing
- 46–60 Serious concerns — pervasive across most areas
Each question scores 0 to 4 across fifteen items, for a total of 0–60. One answer carries more weight than its four points: contempt. Mockery, sneering and being talked down to is the pattern most strongly associated with relationships failing, and a high score on that item deserves attention whatever the total came to.
Are you ever afraid of your partner? If yes, this is no longer a question about relationship quality, and the help you need is different.
The short answer
What makes a relationship toxic?
A relationship is toxic when its normal state — rather than its bad days — is contempt, disrespect or imbalance, and when being in it consistently leaves you worse rather than supported. The word gets used loosely for anyone difficult, which is a shame, because the pattern it points at is specific and recognisable. It is not one argument, one bad month, or a partner who is hard work during a difficult year. It is a settled direction: effort running one way, honesty becoming expensive, and the sense of yourself that you bring into the relationship coming out smaller.
The patterns that do the predicting are undramatic. Criticism aimed at character rather than behaviour, contempt, defensiveness that makes every problem yours, and withdrawal used instead of engagement. These are observable from outside in minutes, which is why they forecast outcomes better than any single dramatic event does.
Toxic describes a relationship that is bad for you. Coercive control describes one that is unsafe. They overlap, they are not the same, and only one of them is a matter for a questionnaire.
The Gottman Institute describes the four interaction patterns this quiz is built around, along with their antidotes: a gentle start-up in place of criticism, appreciation in place of contempt, taking some responsibility in place of defensiveness, and a genuine break followed by return in place of stonewalling. The antidotes are the practical part, and they are more specific than most relationship advice manages.
View sourceThe patterns
What the fifteen questions ask about
Four interaction patterns, then the wider dynamics they tend to produce.
Criticism aimed at who you are
“You are selfish” rather than “I felt hurt when that happened”. The distinction sounds small and is not: one raises a problem, the other indicts a person, and only one can be resolved.
Contempt
Mockery, sneering, eye-rolling, name-calling, being talked down to. The most corrosive of the four and the most strongly associated with relationships failing, because it communicates superiority rather than disagreement.
Defensiveness and counterattack
Disagreements that turn into deflection, with neither person able to take any responsibility. Raising something reliably produces a counter-grievance rather than a response, so nothing is ever actually discussed.
Stonewalling and withdrawal
Shutting down completely rather than working through something. Needing a break when flooded is healthy and normal; disappearing as a tactic, or as the only available response, is not.
Disrespect and imbalance
Feeling belittled or dismissed, effort running mostly one way, and your needs consistently coming second. Individually survivable; as a settled arrangement, corrosive.
Control, and who you are allowed to be
Whether you edit yourself, keep things quiet to avoid a reaction, or have watched your other relationships thin out. This cluster is where the quiz starts asking about something more serious than unhappiness.
Rough patch, toxic, or coercive control
Three situations that need three different responses.
| Situation | What it looks like | What helps |
|---|---|---|
| A rough patch | Out of character, tied to something external. | Time and plain conversation. It usually passes. |
| Toxic dynamics | Contempt and imbalance as the normal state. | Naming it, therapy, or changing the distance. |
| Coercive control | Fear, monitoring, isolation, restriction. | Specialist support. Not a conversation to have alone. |
| How do I know which one I am in? | The most useful question is whether you are ever afraid — of a reaction, of consequences, of what happens if you say no. Unhappiness makes you tired and resentful. Control makes you careful. If you are modifying your behaviour to manage what might happen rather than to keep the peace, that is the third column. | |
Reading your result
What should you take from the number?
Three things worth more than the total.
- 01 Whether contempt is present
The one to weight heavily
Mockery, sneering or being talked down to deserves attention regardless of your total, because contempt is the pattern most strongly linked to relationships ending and the hardest one to recover from once it has become the normal register.
- 02 Whether you are ever afraid
This changes the question entirely
Fear moves this out of the territory a relationship quiz can assess. If you monitor your own behaviour to manage what your partner might do, the relevant help is specialist support rather than better communication.
- 03 Whether your circle has shrunk
Isolation is a mechanism
Relationships like this frequently narrow who you see, sometimes without anyone intending it. If your other relationships have quietly thinned since this one began, treat that as part of the pattern rather than circumstance and as a reason to tell someone.
It cannot see history or context, and it cannot tell a bad year from a bad match. It only asks about your partner’s behaviour, so it will not tell you about your own half of the dynamic, which is usually part of the picture. Most importantly it cannot see coercive control, because the questions that would detect it are not safe to ask on a page someone else might see. If fear is present, the hotline below is the right starting point rather than any result here.
Things people ask early
The questions that come up first
Three worth answering before the detail.
Does a high score mean I should leave?
No. It means the patterns you described are the kind that do damage if nothing changes. What you do about that is a decision, and this page does not get to make it.
Can a toxic relationship become healthy?
Sometimes, when both people want it to and the problems are behaviours rather than fundamental mismatches. Couples therapy works considerably better early than late.
Is it toxic if we argue a lot?
Not necessarily. Frequent arguing predicts little on its own. What matters is whether contempt has entered, and whether anyone can take responsibility.
What helps
What actually helps
In order of cost, and the first one is cheaper than people expect.
- 01 / START HERE
Change how conversations open
How a difficult conversation starts shapes how it ends more than the subject does. One specific, recent, non-accusing example beats a summary of everything that has ever been wrong, and it is the single most learnable thing here.
- 02 / NAME THE PATTERN
Not the incident
“When I raise something, it ends with me apologising” is much harder to deflect than arguing about a particular evening, and it is closer to the actual problem. Expect it to land badly at first; that is not the same as it being rejected.
- 03 / GET HELP EARLIER THAN FEELS NECESSARY
Therapy, or a hotline if there is fear
Couples therapy is most effective before resentment sets, which is the opposite of when most people try it. If any part of this involves fear, control or coercion, skip that and talk to a domestic violence service instead — couples therapy is not appropriate where there is control.
Background: The National Domestic Violence Hotline. This page is educational and is not medical advice.
What to do next
What should you do with your result?
Three things worth doing whatever the number said.
- 01
Write down the two questions you scored highest on
Those are the specific conversation. A general sense that the relationship is bad is much harder to act on than two recurring, nameable behaviours.
- 02
Answer the fear question honestly, to yourself
Are you ever afraid of your partner? Nobody else needs the answer, and it determines whether anything else on this page is the right advice for you.
- 03
Tell one person what has actually been happening
In specifics rather than impressions. Isolation makes all of this harder, and saying it out loud is usually clarifying in a way that thinking about it is not.
This quiz measures relationship quality, and that is a different question from safety. If you are afraid of your partner, monitored, isolated from friends or family, threatened, restricted in money or movement, or pressured into things you do not want, please talk to someone rather than trying to score it. In the US the National Domestic Violence Hotline is free and confidential on 1-800-799-7233, or you can text START to 88788. If you are in immediate danger, call 911. If this has left you feeling hopeless or thinking of harming yourself, call or text 988 to reach the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, any time of day. Elsewhere you can find a line in your own country at findahelpline.com. You do not need to have decided anything about the relationship, and you do not need to be certain that what is happening counts.
Good questions to ask
Toxic relationship quiz — FAQs
What people actually ask about toxic relationships.
The reliable signs of a toxic relationship are patterns rather than incidents: criticism aimed at your character rather than at a problem, contempt in the form of mockery or being talked down to, defensiveness that turns every issue back on you, and withdrawal used instead of engagement. Alongside those, effort running mostly one way, feeling consistently belittled, and editing yourself to avoid a reaction. Any of these can happen in a good relationship on a bad month; the sign is when they describe the normal state of things.
Contempt. It is singled out among the interaction patterns associated with relationships failing because it communicates superiority rather than disagreement — eye-rolling, sneering, mockery, name-calling, talking to a partner as though they were stupid. Anger says something matters; contempt says the other person is beneath consideration. It is also the pattern most worth naming early, because couples who catch it can usually change it.
Coercive control is the practical dividing line. A toxic relationship is one that is consistently bad for you — contempt, imbalance, disrespect. An abusive relationship involves fear and control: being monitored, isolated from other people, restricted in money or movement, threatened, or made to change your behaviour to manage what might happen. The two overlap, but they need different responses, and couples therapy is not appropriate where there is coercive control.
Frequent arguing on its own predicts remarkably little. Plenty of couples who disagree loudly and often are fine, and plenty who never raise their voices are not. What matters is what the arguing is made of: whether criticism attacks the person, whether contempt has entered, whether either of you can take any responsibility, and whether one of you shuts down entirely. Recurring arguments that never fully resolve are normal in most long relationships.
Think about it carefully. Handing someone a score tends to feel like an ambush, and if the patterns here are accurate it will most likely be turned back on you. Picking the one or two things that mattered most and raising them in your own words usually goes better. If you are unsure how they would react, treat that uncertainty as meaningful, and our Am I Being Manipulated? check is worth taking before you decide.
Often, if both people want it to be and the problems are behaviours rather than incompatibilities. The interaction patterns this quiz measures are learnable in both directions, and couples therapy addresses them directly. What does not work is one person trying to fix it alone while the other denies there is anything to fix — and a flat refusal to consider help is itself a piece of information.
It is extremely common, and it usually has two causes at once: you know a version of them that your friends do not see, and admitting the pattern out loud makes it harder to keep tolerating. Noticing that you do it is worth more than stopping. People who find themselves defending a partner to everyone who raises a concern are often the last to let themselves see the pattern.
Trust that. Fifteen questions cannot cover every way a relationship can be wrong for you, and plenty of unhappy relationships involve none of these patterns — mismatched lives, different wants, or simply having grown apart. None of that requires anyone to be behaving badly, and none of it is less real for not scoring highly here.
Yes. The quiz is free, needs no account or sign-up, and your result appears only in your browser. Nothing is sent to us.
Editorial transparency
Sources and review information
These fifteen questions are a house scale, written for this page. They are our own wording rather than a published instrument, organised around the interaction patterns the research describes. Content is written and reviewed by the PsyMed Editorial Team from the sources listed here. We are writers and researchers, not clinicians, and this page is educational rather than diagnostic. Read how we build our tests and who we are.
Research and editorial references
- The Gottman Institute. What defines a toxic relationship, and the four interaction patterns and their antidotes. gottman.com — the source for the four patterns this quiz is organised around, and for the point that contempt is the most corrosive of them. gottman.com/blog/what-defines-a-toxic-relationship
- Coercive control in intimate partner violence — research on control as a pattern distinct from individual incidents of violence. PMC6291212 — the basis for the distinction this page draws between a relationship that is bad for you and one that is unsafe, and for treating control rather than conflict as the marker. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6291212
- Further research on coercive control and its relationship with personality disorder severity (PMC12411753) supports the same distinction. The National Domestic Violence Hotline — 1-800-799-7233, or text START to 88788 — is linked above; both the number and the keyword were read directly from the organisation’s own site rather than quoted from memory.
- We deliberately quote no divorce-prediction accuracy percentage on this page. The figures that circulate come from small samples with the patterns identified after the fact and are routinely overstated. We also give no prevalence figure for intimate partner violence; the page routes to a hotline instead of quantifying.
A pattern, not a verdict
Ask yourself the fear question first.
If contempt is the normal register of your relationship, that is worth taking seriously whatever the total said. And if you are ever afraid of your partner, that is a different question entirely, and the help listed above is the right place to start.
Take the quiz